AC(q)min happens at a market price of $6.00
At $6.00, the firm earns "normal economic profits" of 0.
At any market price below $6.00, firm earns losses
At any market price above $6.00, firm earns "supernormal profits"
Short run: firms that shut down (q∗=0) stuck in market, incur fixed costs π=−f
Long run: firms earning losses (π<0) can exit the market and earn π=0
Short run: firms that shut down (q∗=0) stuck in market, incur fixed costs π=−f
Long run: firms earning losses (π<0) can exit the market and earn π=0
Entrepreneurs & Firms not currently in market can choose to enter and start producing, if entry would earn them π>0
When p<AVC
Profits are negative
Short run: shut down production
Long run: firms in industry exit the industry
When AVC<p<AC
Profits are negative
Short run: continue production
Long run: firms in industry exit the industry
When AC<p
Profits are positive
Short run: continue production
Long run: firms in industry stay in industry
1. Choose q∗ such that MR(q)=MC(q)
1. Choose q∗ such that MR(q)=MC(q)
2. Profit π=q[p−AC(q)]
1. Choose q∗ such that MR(q)=MC(q)
2. Profit π=q[p−AC(q)]
3. Shut down in the short run if p<AVC(q)
1. Choose q∗ such that MR(q)=MC(q)
2. Profit π=q[p−AC(q)]
3. Shut down in the short run if p<AVC(q)
Firm's short run (inverse) supply:
{p=MC(q)if p≥AVCq=0If p<AVC
1. Choose q∗ such that MR(q)=MC(q)
2. Profit π=q[p−AC(q)]
3. Shut down in the short run if p<AVC(q)
Firm's short run (inverse) supply:
{p=MC(q)if p≥AVCq=0If p<AVC
4. Exit in the long run if p<AC(q)
1. Choose q∗ such that MR(q)=MC(q)
2. Profit π=q[p−AC(q)]
3. Shut down in the short run if p<AVC(q)
Firm's short run (inverse) supply:
{p=MC(q)if p≥AVCq=0If p<AVC
4. Exit in the long run if p<AC(q)
Firm's long run (inverse) supply:
{p=MC(q)if p≥ACq=0If p<AC
Agents have objectives they value
Agents face constraints
Make tradeoffs to maximize objectives within constraints
Agents have objectives they value
Agents face constraints
Make tradeoffs to maximize objectives within constraints
Agents face competition from others that affect prices
Agents adjust their behaviors based on prices
Stable outcomes result where all agents cease adjusting
If people can learn and change their behavior, they will always switch to a higher-valued option
If there are no alternatives that are better, people are at an optimum
If everyone is at an optimum, the system is in equilibrium
Now we must combine optimizing individual firms with market-wide adjustment to equilibrium
Since π=[p−AC(q)]q, in the long run, profit-seeking firms will:
Now we must combine optimizing individual firms with market-wide adjustment to equilibrium
Since π=[p−AC(q)]q, in the long run, profit-seeking firms will:
Now we must combine optimizing individual firms with market-wide adjustment to equilibrium
Since π=[p−AC(q)]q, in the long run, profit-seeking firms will:
Long-run equilibrium: entry and exist cases when p=AC(q) for all firms, implying normal economic profits of π=0
Zero Profits Theorem: long run economic profits for all firms in a competitive industry are 0
Firms must earn an accounting profit to stay in business
A constant tendency as output prices are pushed down and input prices are bid up, squeezing economic profits to 0
In real life, constant changes in underlying prices, technology, preferences
Industry supply curve: sum of all individual firms' supply curves (MC(q) curve above AVCmin)
To keep it simple on the following slides:
Industry demand curve (where equal to supply curve) sets market price, demand for each firm
Short Run: each firm is earning profits p>AC(q)
Long run: induces entry by firm 3, firm 4, ⋯, firm n
Industry demand curve (where equal to supply curve) sets market price, demand for each firm
Short Run: each firm is earning profits p>AC(q)
Long run: induces entry by firm 3, firm 4, ⋯, firm n
Long run industry equilibrium:
Industry demand curve (where equal to supply curve) sets market price, demand for each firm
Short Run: each firm is earning profits p>AC(q)
Long run: induces entry by firm 3, firm 4, ⋯, firm n
Long run industry equilibrium: p=AC(q)min, π=0 at p= $6
Industry demand curve (where equal to supply curve) sets market price, demand for each firm
Long run industry equilibrium: p=AC(q)min, π=0 for marginal (highest cost) firm (Firm 2)
Industry demand curve (where equal to supply curve) sets market price, demand for each firm
Long run industry equilibrium: p=AC(q)min, π=0 for marginal (highest cost) firm (Firm 2)
Firm 1 (lower cost) appears to be earning profits
With differences between firms, long-run equilibrium p=AC(q)min of the marginal (highest-cost) firm
"Inframarginal" (lower-cost) firms earn economic rents: returns higher than their opportunity cost (what is needed to bring them online
Economic rents arise from relative differences between firms
Relatively scarce factors in the economy (talent, location, secrets, IP, licenses, being first, political favoritism, lobbying)
Inframarginal firms using the scarce factors gain a cost-advantage
It would seem these firms earn profits as other firms have higher costs
But what will happen to the prices for the scarce factors?
Rents ≠ profits!
Rival firms willing to pay for rent-generating factor to gain advantage
Rents are included in the opportunity cost (price) for inputs
Firm does not earn the rents, they raise firm's costs and squeeze out profits!
Factor owners (workers, landowners, inventors, etc) earn the rents as higher payments for their services (wages, rents, interest, royalties, etc).
Firms entering or exiting an industry have an effect on the new market price
Think about basic supply & demand graphs:
How large this change in price will be from entry/exit depends on industry-wide costs and external economies
Economies of scale are internal to the firm (a firm's own average cost curve)
External economies have to do with how the size of the entire industry affects all individual firm's costs
Three possibilities
Constant cost industry has no external economies, no change in costs as industry output increases (firms enter & incumbents produce more)
A perfectly elastic long-run industry supply curve!
Determinants:
Examples: toothpicks, domain name registration, waitstaff
Industry equilibrium: firms earning normal π=0,p=MC(q)=AC(q)
Exogenous increase in market demand
Short run (A→B): industry reaches new equilibrium
Firms charge higher p∗, produce more q∗, earn π
Long run (B→C): profit attracts entry ⟹ industry supply increases
No change in costs to firms in industry, firms enter until π=0 at p=AC(q)
Firms must charge original p∗, return to original q∗, earn π=0
Increasing cost industry has external _dis_economies, costs rise for all firms in the industry as industry output increases (firms enter & incumbents produce more)
An upward sloping long-run industry supply curve!
Determinants:
Examples: oil, mining, particle physics
Industry equilibrium: firms earning normal π=0,p=MC(q)=AC(q)
Exogenous increase in market demand
Short run (A→B): industry reaches new equilibrium
Firms charge higher p∗, produce more q∗, earn π
Long run: profit attracts entry ⟹ industry supply will increase
But more production increases costs (MC,AC) for all firms in industry
Long run (B→C): firms enter until π=0 at p=AC(q)
Firms charge higher p∗, producer lower q∗, earn π=0
Decreasing cost industry has external economies, costs fall for all firms in the industry as industry output increases (firms enter & incumbents produce more)
A downward sloping long-run industry supply curve!
Determinants:
Examples: geographic clusters, public utilities, infrastructure, entertainment
Tends towards "natural" monopoly
Industry equilibrium: firms earning normal π=0,p=MC(q)=AC(q)
Exogenous increase in market demand
Short run (A→B): industry reaches new equilibrium
Firms charge higher p∗, produce more q∗, earn π
Long run: profit attracts entry ⟹ industry supply will increase
But more production lowers costs (MC,AC) for all firms in industry
Long run (B→C): firms enter until π=0 at p=AC(q)
Firms charge higher p∗, producer lower q∗, earn π=0
Example: q=2p−4
Example: p=2+0.5q
Example: p=2+0.5q
Graphable (price on vertical axis)!
Slope: 0.5
Vertical intercept called the "Choke price": price where qS=0 ($2), just low enough to discourage any sales
Example: p=2+0.5q
Read two ways:
Horizontally: at any given price, how many units firm wants to sell
Vertically: at any given quantity, the minimum willingness to accept (WTA) for that quantity
ϵqS,p=%ΔqS%Δp
ϵqS,p=%ΔqS%Δp
"Elastic" | "Unit Elastic" | "Inelastic" | |
---|---|---|---|
Intuitively: | Large response | Proportionate response | Little response |
Mathematically: | ϵqs,p>1 | ϵqs,p=1 | ϵqs,p<1 |
Numerator > Denominator | Numerator = Denominator | Numerator < Denominator | |
A 1% change in p | More than 1% change in qS | 1% change in qS | Less than 1% change in qS |
An identical 100% price increase on an:
"Inelastic" Supply Curve
"Elastic" Supply Curve
ϵq,p=1slope×pq
First term is the inverse of the slope of the inverse supply curve (that we graph)!
To find the elasticity at any point, we need 3 things:
Example: The supply of bicycle rentals in a small town is given by:
qS=10p−200
Find the inverse supply function.
What is the price elasticity of supply at a price of $25.00?
What is the price elasticity of supply at a price of $50.00?
ϵq,p=1slope×pq
Elasticity ≠ slope (but they are related)!
Elasticity changes along the supply curve
Often gets less elastic as ↑ price (↑ quantity)
What determines how responsive your selling behavior is to a price change?
Increasing/Decreasing/Constant Cost industry ⟹ less/more/perfectly elastic supply
Smaller (larger) share of market for inputs ⟹ more (less) elastic
What determines how responsive your selling behavior is to a price change?
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |