qDx=D(m,px,py)
ΔqDxΔpx<0
The law of demand: as the price of a good rises, people will tend to buy less of that good (and vice versa)
The price effect (law of demand) is actually the net result of two effects
(Real) income effect: change in consumption due to change in real purchasing power
The price effect (law of demand) is actually the net result of two effects
(Real) income effect: change in consumption due to change in real purchasing power
Substitution effect: change in consumption due to change in relative prices
The price effect (law of demand) is actually the net result of two effects
(Real) income effect: change in consumption due to change in real purchasing power
Substitution effect: change in consumption due to change in relative prices
Price Effect=Real income effect+Substitution Effect
Suppose there is only 1 good to consume, x. You have a $100 income, and the price of x is $10. You consume 10 units of x
Suppose the price of x falls to $5. Your now consume 20 units of x.
This is the real income effect: a change in the price of x changes your real income or purchasing power, the amount of goods you can buy
Note your actual (nominal) income of $100 never changed!
The size of the income effect depends on how large a portion of your budget you spend on the good
Large-budget items:
Small-budget items:
Suppose there are 1000s of goods, none of them are a major fraction of your budget
Suppose the price of one good, x increases
The real income effect for x is tiny (and negative)
But you would consume less of x relative to other goods because x is now relatively more expensive
That's the substitution effect: consumption changes because of a change in relative prices
Price Effect=Real income effect+Substitution Effect
Original optimal consumption (A)
(Total) price effect: A→C
Let's decompose this into the two effects
Substitution effect: what would have been chosen at the new price ratio to remain indifferent as before
Graphically: shift new budget constraint inwards until tangent with old indifference curve
A→B on same I.C. (↑ cheaper x and ↓ y)
Substitution effect: what would have been chosen at the new price ratio to remain indifferent as before
Graphically: shift new budget constraint inwards until tangent with old indifference curve
A→B on same I.C. (↑ cheaper x and ↓ y)
(Real) income effect: change in quantities consumed due to the change in purchasing power after the change in price
B→C to new budget constraint (can buy more of x and/or y)
(Real) income effect: change in quantities consumed due to the change in purchasing power after the change in price
B→C to new budget constraint (can buy more of x and/or y)
Original optimal consumption (A)
Price of x falls, new optimal consumption at (C)
Original optimal consumption (A)
Price of x falls, new optimal consumption at (C)
Substitution effect: A→B on same I.C. (↑ cheaper x and ↓ y)
Original optimal consumption (A)
Price of x falls, new optimal consumption at (C)
Substitution effect: A→B on same I.C. (↑ cheaper x and ↓ y)
(Real) income effect: B→C to new budget constraint (can buy more of x and/or y)
Original optimal consumption (A)
Price of x falls, new optimal consumption at (C)
Substitution effect: A→B on same I.C. (↑ cheaper x and ↓ y)
(Real) income effect: B→C to new budget constraint (can buy more of x and/or y)
(Total) price effect: A→C
What about for an inferior good (like Ramen)?
Substitution effect: A→B on same I.C. (↑ cheaper x and ↓ y)
What about for an inferior good (like Ramen)?
Substitution effect: A→B on same I.C. (↑ cheaper x and ↓ y)
(Real) income effect: B→C to new budget constraint (can buy more of x and/or y)
What about for an inferior good (like Ramen)?
Substitution effect: A→B on same I.C. (↑ cheaper x and ↓ y)
(Real) income effect: B→C to new budget constraint (can buy more of x and/or y)
(Total) price effect: A→C
What about for an inferior good (like Ramen)?
Substitution effect: A→B on same I.C. (↑ cheaper x and ↓ y)
(Real) income effect: B→C to new budget constraint (can buy more of x and/or y)
(Total) price effect: A→C
Price effect is still an ↑x from a ↓px!
The law of demand holds, even for inferior goods!
Example: What would it take to violate the law of demand?
Substitution Effect+Real Income Effect=Price Effect
Substitution effect: is always in the direction of the cheaper good
Real Income effect: can be positive (normal) or negative *inferior)
Law of Demand/Demand curves slope downwards (Price effect) mostly because of the substitution effect
Exception in the theoretical Giffen good: negative R.I.E. > S.E.
Demand schedule expresses the quantity of good a person would be willing to buy (qD) at any given price (px)
Note: each of these is a consumer's optimum at a given price!
price | quantity |
---|---|
10 | 0 |
9 | 1 |
8 | 2 |
7 | 3 |
6 | 4 |
5 | 5 |
4 | 6 |
3 | 7 |
8 | 2 |
9 | 1 |
10 | 0 |
Demand curve graphically represents the demand schedule
Also measures a person's maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for a given quantity
Law of Demand (price effect) ⟹ Demand curves always slope downwards
Example: q=10−p
Example: p=10−q
Example: p=10−q
Graphable (price on vertical axis)!
Slope: −1
Vertical intercept called the "Choke price": price where qD=0 ($10), just high enough to discourage any purchases
Example: p=10−q
Read two ways:
Horizontally: at any given price, how many units person wants to buy
Vertically: at any given quantity, the maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for that quantity
I will always give you a (linear) demand function
Today's class notes page shows how you can derive actual demand functions from utility functions
MATH FYI: for a Cobb-Douglas utility function (where the two exponents sum to 1): u(x,y)=xay(1−a)
the demand function for x is qx=ampx
Property 1: Consumer always spends proportion a of their total income on x!
Ptroperty 2: demand for x is unaffected by prices of other goods (no py anywhere)!
To get a demand function just in terms of price, input a given income.
Example: u(x,y)=x0.5y0.5, demand function is
qx=0.5mpx
Always spend 50% (a) of income on x
With an income of m=10 Demand: qx=5pxInv. demand: px=5qx
With an income of m=50 Demand: qx=25pxInv. demand: px=25qx
Example: q=10−p or p=10−q
What about all the other "determinants of demand" like income and other prices?
They are captured in the vertical intercept (choke price)!
Example: q=10−p or p=10−q
What about all the other "determinants of demand" like income and other prices?
They are captured in the vertical intercept (choke price)!
A change in one of the "determinants of demand" (or "shifters") will shift the demand curve
Shows up in (inverse) demand function by a change in the intercept (choke price)!
See my Visualizing Demand Shifters
qDx=D(m,px,py)
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |